Filter Prioritize Remediate Explore

Risk scoring grounded in reality

Real exposure. Real impact. Scored on your environment, not theory

How is this CVE exposed?

Defendermate

Models real attack paths from the internet inward. Only verified exploitable CVEs create hops. If the conditions aren't met, the hop doesn't exist. Paths are ranked by attacker efficiency: shortest route to your highest-value targets surfaces first.

The industry

CNAPPs and ASM tools model graph reachability. "Internet-facing" is often a binary flag. CVEs in the path are unverified. A package that's present but not exploitable still creates a hop. The path looks real but isn't.

What happens if its exploited?

Defendermate

Models what an attacker actually gains at each step. An RCE opens different doors than info disclosure. Blast radius is computed to your critical resources. You see what's at stake, not just what's connected.

The industry

CNAPPs and ASM tools treat every CVE the same. An RCE, a container escape, and a DoS all produce identical path behavior. No consequence typing. Blast radius is a count of downstream nodes, not a measure of what an attacker actually gains.

What signals should drive your risk scores?

Defendermate

Three views of risk that reflect your environment, not a global average. Each CVE is scored by combining internal signals from your environment (exposure paths, blast radius, business impact) with external signals from the world (CVSS, KEV, EPSS). The result is a score per vulnerability, per attack path, and per resource.

The industry

RBVM tools add asset context like criticality tags and network exposure, but still score unverified findings. Severity and threat intelligence dominate. CVSS and EPSS are purely external. None verify exploitability, model real attack paths, or type blast radius consequences. Every finding gets a score regardless of whether it's exploitable in your environment.

Start exploring

Live sandbox. Free account.